George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four Essay

George Orwells cardinal Eighty-Four is a dystopian impudent which set ups an exagerated version of a totalistic politics which non and controlled incessantlyything tho which also could non be removed by any means. Orwells tonic drew attention, back in 1949 when the novel was published, upon how this initiation would side like if a totalitarian regime would truly take over. My account for this essay is to analyze Orwells novel with respect to the marxist elements present in the novel and also to illustrate their impact upon the p depravationagonists feelings.Marxism and especi wholey Stalinism are present in Orwells novel by means of certain elements countinuous surveillance, control of the mind, the cult of personality and a sibylline equality between the political partys members. Isaac Asimov, in his essay round of 1984, considers Orwell as a writer with non much of an imagi solid ground, accvictimization him of not developing in the novel the actual communist acti ons which were happening in reality. Orwell imagines Great Britain to have gone through a revolution exchangeable to the Russian Revolution and to have gone through all the stages that Soviet development did.He cigaret think of almost no variations on the theme. I believe, though, that Orwell was an extraordinary visionary who pictured a society chained in nothing but governmental controll, a society which thunder mugnot be defeated. A communist concept presented in the novel is that of the caterless singular and of the high disregard the fellowship had for individualism. Everybody essential form a root with everybody this is the recipe for power, according to any communism regime. In 1984, muniment is forever rewritten and in this room, the populations memories are re fixeded only to what appears in the remaining articles after rewriting it butt be discriminaten as other way of mind control.Winston himself discovers that most of what the Party states is lies and tow ards the end of the novel, when Oceania suddenly becomes enemies with Eastasia, the realm with which it had been allies all along, everybody is forced to conceive that they have eternally been at war with Eastasia. Ramesh K. writes in his essay Socio-Cultural Matrix in George Orwells Nineteen Eighty Four that history is constantly rewritten to suit the current goals of the Party. that the destruction of human memory leave alone make it possible.Hence the Ministry of faithfulness (Minitru) modifies history perpetually to the tune of the ideals of the Party. As a give of the rewriting of history is the loss of memories. Nobody remembers how life looked like earlier humongous pal, and yet nobody seems to find it as disturbing as Winston does. He barely remembers his family, and he suspects that most of his memories are only a product of his imagination. He has problems recalling maternal love he some clocks feels nefarious for his parents disappearance and he constantly regre ts his childhood behavior.When regarding history, the only real proof or better said, evidence, of much(prenominal) distant civilizations, ones before soprano chum, is written in censored books, created by the Party itself, with carefully selected detail which attempt to illustrate how life is much better in the social class of 1984, with the Ingsoc regime, then before the totalitarian era. Truth is continuously distorted and it can be regarded as close to extinction, since nobody has a correct printing of what is or is not true, anymore. Memories are vague and the ones vivid are imposed, findd by the Party.The loss of memories the whole society experiences may also be a result of the continuous flow of current information which constantly contradicts the mature one and which, in its turn, is recreated over and over again. The process of rewriting history is described in 1984 This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodica ls, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs to every kind of literature or musical accompaniment which might conceivably hold any political or ideologic significance (Orwell, Part 1, Chapter 4, p. 1).The cult of personality has a huge influence on Orwells dystopia, as on any other totalitarian society. Big chum has been associated by the critics with Stalin, darn his political enemy, another say founder of the Party, Emmanuel Goldstein, was seen as the correspondent of Trotsky, Stalins enemy in the power struggle from the 1920s. Like Trotsky, Goldstein was deported and excluded from the Party.According to Isaac Asimov, Orwells enemy was Stalin, and at the time that 1984 was published, Stalin ad ruled the Soviet Union in a ribbreaking induce hug for twenty-five years, had survived a terrible war in which his nation suffered enormous losses and yet was now stronger than ever. To Orwell, it must have seemed that neither time nor fortune could budge Stalin, but that he would live on forever with ever increasing strength. And that was how Orwell pictured Big familiar. Big Brother is regarded as immortal, the is no evidence of his actual existence, and until now OBrien hints to the fact that Big Brother is nothing more than the embodiment of the Party.In the fictional book written by Goldstein he states that Nobody has ever seen Big Brother. He is a face on the hoardings, a vowelise on the telescreen. We may be reasonably sure that he will never die, and on that point is already considerable uncertainty as to when he was born. Big Brother is the guise in which the Party chooses to exhibit itself to the world (Orwell, Part 2, Chapter 9, p. 262). Big Brother was everywhere On coins, on stamps, on the covers of books, on banners, on posters, and on the wrappings of a cigarette packet everywhere. ceaselessly the eyes watching you and the voice enveloping you. Asleep or awake, work or eating, indoors or out of doors, in the bat h or in bedno escape. Nothing was your own except the a few(prenominal) cubic centimetres inside your skull (Orwell, Part 1, Chapter 2, p. 34). In such a strict society, Winston attempts rebelling against the Party and also falling in love. Once he meets Julia, his double life takes form and he finds himself in a continuous attempt for freedom. The relationship between Winston and Julia is, of course, sentenced to permanent influences on behalf of the Party.They attempt to rebell against it but their disorder is nothing but a narrowed one, with no actual influence upon the Party. In a world where everything, with no exception, has been adapted to completely new rules, where history is continuously modified and the truth is contorsed over and over again, not even love or friendship remain the same. Winston and Julia are suppositional to be in love and moreover, they are supposed to be not only friends, but allies in their fight against the system, but in 1984, in this parallel ve rsion of totalitarianism Orwell created, friendship and love would always be darkened by the others real identity.An typeface for how love is reduced can be found in the result when Julia attempts to dress up for Winston, when renting the room above the antiquities shop, a room which does not have a telescreen. She hardly manages to become feminin by using a very bad smelling perfume which cultivates about terrific memories to Winston and by wearing ugly and yet different from the Partys uniform clothes. It seems like no one has the ability of existence amatory any long-lived, and even more important, no one has the means of being so.In 1984, no possible love relationship can be imagined and the idea of making love is something strictly forbidden, because making love and this is something the Party knows very well makes masses joyous, and when people are happy, they no longer care for every bad thing that happens in their every sidereal day life in the context of a totalitarian society. Julia explained to Winston the Partys conception When you make love youre using up muscle and afterwards you feel happy and dont give a damn for anything. They cant bear you to feel like that. They loss you to be bursting with energy all the time.All this marching up and take down and cheering and waving flags is simply sex gone sour. If youre happy inside yourself, why should you get excited about Big Brother and the Three-Year Plans and the Two Minutes Hate and all the rest of their bloody rot? (Orwell, Part 2, Chapter 3, p. 167). In the eyes of the Party, theres no such thing as love or friendship, and even the existing feelings can only be pointed towards Big Brother, the totalitarian leader who can only be seen on the posters all over the city, which show Big Brothers portrait and a terrifying slogan Big Brother is watching you.According to Isaac Asimov the great Orwellian contribution to futurity engineering is that the television set is two-way, and that the people who are forced to hear and see the television screen can themselves be heard and seen at all times and are under constant supervision even while sleeping or in the bathroom. Hence, the meaning of the phrase Big Brother is watching you. Love, as already discussed, is distorted, reduced to physical needs (not even physical pleasure).But, as it is easy to notice, throughout the novel, love remains the Partys greatest enemy against which they are already fighting through manipulating the children yet only achieving the destruction of parental love. I consider that children tradeing their parents are a symbol and nonetheless, an illustration of what Orwell may have imagined about future generations who will do everything for the Partys sake even betray their own mothers and fathers. In my opinion, children when regarded as a symbol, are supposed to bring the change into the world.In 1984 they are the reversed, the opposite version of this concept children will not ch ange anything, from their point of view, the totalitarian society must and will remain as it is, with few corrections here and there in the history books, when actions and facts begin to contradict with others. Nearly all children right away were horrible they were systematically turned into ungovernable little savages, and yet this produced in them no tendency whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party.On the contrary, they adore the Party and everything connected with it. All their ferocity was turned outwards, against the enemies of the State, against foreigners, traitors, saboteurs, thought-criminals. It was almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children (Orwell, Chapter 2, p. 31). As a conclusion, 1984 emphasizes not only on the impact of a totalitarian regime upon the society, but also on its impact upon the individuals soul, feelings and thoughts. Winston and Julias rebellion may be described as an abstract one, because they do not really achieve anything.Oliver Substance, in his essay The Tendency of human beings Nineteen Eighty-Four, states that to truly be a rebel, all of ones actions need to be rebellious, not just the ones involving the grassroots human urges. Rebels need plans, or else they end up the same way as every other would-be rebel in way of life 101. The impact upon the reader has no limit, since the novel leaves so much plaza for interpretation and continuation. Finally, I would like to end my essay with the following ingeminate from the novel If you can FEEL that staying human is worth while, even when it cant have any result whatever, youve beaten them (Orwell, Part 2, Chapter 7, p. 210).